LIVE TICKER
[Live wire]Connecting to the newsroom…
← Back to the news wire
Flesch Reading Ease: 36•350 words from the publisher
WorldPublished by BBC World • 11/1/2026, 12:41:24 AMOpen Original Report (BBC World) ↗

Judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein birthday book

President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein posing for a photo together at Mar-a-Lago in 1997

Judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein birthday book
Image supplied by BBC World.

More images from the original report

BBC World
A man signs a 10-foot-tall protest art installation mocking Trump's alleged letter to Epstein at the National Mall in Washington, DC earlier this year
A man signs a 10-foot-tall protest art installation mocking Trump's alleged letter to Epstein at the National Mall in Washington, DC earlier this year

Images BBC World published with this report. Click one to open the source.

Reported by BBC World

President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein posing for a photo together at Mar-a-Lago in 1997

A US judge has thrown out President Donald Trump's $10bn (£7.4bn) lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, ruling the suit was "grasping at straws".

Trump had sued the media outlet's parent company Dow Jones and its leader Rupert Murdoch last year after it reported on a letter allegedly written by Trump to disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as part of a birthday book in 2003, before Epstein was charged with sex crimes.

More from the original report

Trump has denied writing or signing the letter, which included suggestive language and a drawing of the outline of a woman's body.

Judge Darrin Gayles threw out the case, finding the suit runs counter to the First Amendment, which protects freedom of the press.

Gayles had already once dismissed the defamation lawsuit, which sought $20 billion in damages. Trump's team refiled the suit seeking $10 billion, and this time, the judge threw out the case "with prejudice," meaning the suit cannot be filed again.

The news outlet's story about Epstein's 50th birthday book , external - and the letter with Trump's name - came as the Trump administration battled intense bipartisan criticism over the summer for its handling of Epstein documents.

Trump had said the newspaper had slandered him and violated libel laws in publishing the article.

In his 20-page ruling, Gayles noted the paper's "thoughtful and detailed ​investigation" that led to the story and said the lawsuit was "grasping at ‌straws" to "manufacture flaws" in their work.

A man signs a 10-foot-tall protest art installation mocking Trump's alleged letter to Epstein at the National Mall in Washington, DC earlier this year

The judge wrote that Trump's legal team did not prove that the defendants made defamatory statements with "actual malice", which the law requires be proven.

Actual malice is high bar to meet, as it requires proof that the defendant knew the defamatory statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for whether it was true or not.

Trump alleged that the letter obtained and released by the Journal, which…

Original Source Attribution
Published via BBC World • Source domain: bbc.com
Visit Original Source (BBC World) ↗

Client & Community Discussion (0 Comments)

Share your benchmark feedback, workflow questions, or implementation notes below.

● Live Comments Open
Instant publication • Moderated for technical relevance